Builder not Concrete Pumping Company should be responsible
Todd 07-09-2014
comment profile send pm notify

http://commissionwatch.com.au/pentridge-prison-facts/

http://www.cfmeu.asn.au/news/statement-from-dave-noonan-national-construction-secretary-cfmeu

 

 


Doug 07-10-2014
reply profile send pm notify

Looks like very soft ground. I hope you were using more then the standard pads in the front. Because it doesn't look like enough was used for the rear.


Beast 07-10-2014
reply profile send pm notify

Sounds like he knew and others knew of the recent excavations , I believe both contractor and pump company have liabilities here , that size of pump , operator and management of a company bear some responsibility in assuring that safe setup and adequate cribbing or mats should be provided onsite , look at the ruts in the ground that is made by what appears to be a skytrack or Lull forklift 


lucky phil 07-11-2014
reply profile send pm notify

The pumps a 53m sermac. there was half a forest of dunnage in the front and the pump had put in over 200 cubic metres already. The problem with this site is there are a lot of undocumented graves and underground services. The operator was cleared by work safe investigators as was the owner of the pump


Beast 07-11-2014
reply profile send pm notify

then it sounds like the owner and operator did what they was supposed to do and sounds as this falls on the backs of the contractor. after reading these articles sounds as though he is a scheister.


pumpin man 07-13-2014
reply profile send pm notify

Operator error, no one made u setup there