American Companies
peter pumper 08-20-2008
comment profile send pm notify

This is just tooooo true!  Just read and you will see…Amazing!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Japanese company ( Toyota ) and an American  company (Ford Motor Co.) decided to have a canoe race on the Missouri River    Both teams practiced long and hard to reach their peak  performance before the race.
 


 

On the big day, the Japanese won by a mile.


 
 

The Americans, very discouraged and depressed, decided to investigate the reason for the crushing defeat.  A management team made up of senior management was formed to investigate and recommend appropriate action.


 
 

Their conclusion was the Japanese had 8 people rowing and 1 person steering, while the American team had 7 people steering and 2 people rowing.

 


 
 

Feeling a deeper study was in order; American management hired a consulting company and paid them a large amount of money for a second opinion.


 


 

They advised, of course, that too many people were steering the boat, while not enough people were rowing.


 


 

Not sure of how to utilize that information,  but wanting to prevent another loss to the Japanese, the rowing team's  management structure was totally reorganized to 4 steering supervisors,  2 area steering superintendents and 1 assistant superintendent steering  manager.


 

They also implemented a new performance system that would give the 2 people rowing the boat greater incentive to work harder.  It was called the 'Rowing Team Quality First Program,' with meetings, dinners and free pens for the rowers.  There was discussion of getting new paddles, canoes and other equipment, extra vacation days for practices and bonuses.  The pension program was trimmed to 'equal the competition' and some of the resultant savings were channeled into morale boosting programs and teamwork posters.


  

 

The next year the Japanese won by two miles.

 


 

Humiliated, the American management laid-off one rower, halted development of a new canoe, sold all the paddles, and canceled all capital investments for new equipment.  The money saved was distributed to the Senior Executives as bonuses.


 


 

The next year, try as he might, the lone designated rower was unable to even finish the race (having no paddles,) so he was laid off for unacceptable performance, all canoe equipment was sold and the next year's racing team was out-sourced to India

 


 

Sadly, the End.


  


 

Here's something else to think about: Ford has spent the last thirty years moving all its factories out  of the US , claiming they can't make money paying American  wages.


 

TOYOTA has spent the last thirty years building more than a dozen plants inside the US    The last quarter's results:


 


 

TOYOTA makes 4 billion in profits  while Ford racked up 9 billion in losses.


 

Ford folks are still  scratching their heads, and collecting bonuses.


 

IF  THIS WEREN'T SO TRUE IT MIGHT BE FUNNY

 

 

 


Bob 08-20-2008
reply profile send pm notify

Too much

S pecial

H igh

I ntensity

T raining

and no rowing.

Great story SBT ;~)


Seed 08-20-2008
reply profile send pm notify

That was GOOD! I think you just added two years on my life in laughter!

Thanks, ans so true!

SEED

 

 


waterbox07 08-20-2008
reply profile send pm notify

I will say this,  The old bosses at ford really had no vision for the future, but the new team in there know is really good.  When Carl Ichan puts billions of his monry on the line to invest in Ford things can not be all bad.    But really when you look at it in prospective  ford made Trucks and Suvs that were the top sellers in their class for many years.

I do not think anyone would have throught that oil prices would rise 300% so fast.

  Another thing about Toyota is they have been making small gas sipping cars for a very long time,  there is time that theses products go in and out of style.  Remember most americans would still drive a big Suv if the millage would increass by 10 to 15%.  also  remember that not to long along that Ford was selling 1.50000  F150 a year  making 15%  per truck that rolled off the assembly line. the market is changing but it will all work out for them in the end.

 Ford has very brighter in the near future. 

     I will take all comers in this thread.  I have really been studied  this 

 Take emotion out and lets have a serious chat so i can school  you with some fax.


eugene 08-20-2008
reply profile send pm notify

the reason ford bought volvo cars is because they have the technology and ford can build the parts for them.

toyota is the major consumer of asin/warner transmissions the are used in volvos but only to volvos specs. a toyota motor is a rip off of volvo, their axles are GM

putz wants people with toyota manufactouring experience.

if GM went away would we miss them, well all they do is mass produce crap after someone else developed the market.

hey ford is a great company and they will start suppling euro cars to the US.

when iam in the KTM motorcycle shop for dirt bikes and they tell me that they have a new plant to double thier production it makes me think do they not care about the lack of fuel or the cost, nope.


roadhog 08-21-2008
reply profile send pm notify

This story makes me sick!Because its true.Lord help us!!

Bob 08-21-2008
reply profile send pm notify

American auto mfg’s have two very large problems,

1.       They never drove the consumer to understand what he needed. They thought that the oil bid’nez was on the same side that they were and bigger is better; and bigger and even better was a huge auto gas guzzler that self destructed after 4.3 years.

2.       The giant, ever growing liability of retirement benefit obligations.

The Japanese walked in the door with a good product that had fewer bells and whistles but ran well and lasted one hell of a long time. They set up production in non union areas of the country and were able to produce a product without the retirement obligations that are the anchor on the American side of the industries ass.

The moral of the story?

When every country in the industrialized world has  government supported retirement and health benefits except the USA; it is almost impossible for the American company to compete.

All those dollars that the US company is spending on benefits off shore companies are spending on research and development.


bri 08-22-2008
reply profile send pm notify

Ever watch GUNGHO? I will stick with American ways thank you!

Bob 08-22-2008
reply profile send pm notify

Yes, I saw it. It was very funny.

The part that everyone forgets is the alternative was unemployment. And the American workers did, at the end, come to a workable situation with the evil empire.

Did I mention that all of those people were UN-employed?


bri 08-22-2008
reply profile send pm notify

If americans can pull together this country would be awsome. If they stop thinking JUST about themselves we would strive

Bob 08-22-2008
reply profile send pm notify

strive (strīv)

intransitive verb strove or strived, striv′enstriv′ ən or strived, striv′·ing

  1. to make great efforts; try very hard to 
  2. to be in conflict; struggle; contend; fight