The Cat | 07-22-2009 | comment profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
The Cat | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
|
||
cpoe | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
were you not able to block other lane with a flag man or cones instead of short rigging |
||
cpoe | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
????????????????? |
||
eugene | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
got the plastermaster part right |
||
biged | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
Thats almost like the one in Hollywood ,if he got over center that might be a repete to me that asking for trouble. |
||
northern pumper | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
That sure is a great set up got to love the oss on the putz. Is that a 63 pretty sweet pictures. Gotta love how the computer will not let you swing past the breaking point. Love the pics |
||
murf | 07-22-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
how do you get away with parked on a pedestrian crossing with the lights still in use............ |
||
The Cat | 07-23-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
there was a lane closure in place as this is one of the main roads into town with a diversion in place for the pedestrian crossing as you can see from the picture's the oss HAS been switich'd ON so no hollywood here the computer stop's you from slewing past the center of the cab. this is a 63 putz. |
||
local18 | 07-23-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
Eugene whats with the silly comments, I don't get it???? |
||
Flint | 07-23-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
Those pictures are correct! That 63m is set up right, and are designed for that type of operation if the OSS is set properly! I operate a 63m in Texas, and have had to do several set ups just like those pictures show! However my unit does not have the locking rings on the front outriggers? |
||
toper | 07-23-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
havn't had to use it yet but when i do im sure it'll come in handy |
||
TooTall | 07-23-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
Man that semi sure was haulinass down the wrong side of the road!!! Here's the difference BigEd, The pump in Holywood had swing out front outriggers and the short side outrigger wasn't fully deployed or extended, only down. The outrigger configuration on the pump above allows them to be fully extended beyond the front of the cab which increases the stability and safe slewing radius. The pic below is an example of Reeds Dragonfly outrigger design which is similar to the pump above... |
||
Lee82 | 07-27-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
has anyone ever seen sensors fail or malfunction? think about it. |
||
dlee7729 | 07-30-2009 | reply profile send pm notify |
I see some problems with street taffic that should have not been allowed. As long as you have the pump set up within the factory guide lines you are ok. Just remeber it is the operators responsibilty to know the specs and boom / outrigger chart position for the pump he is operating regardless of make. Just use that charts thats what there for . be safe |