Pump Company fined $$$$$$$$$ are you next?
Todd 10-02-2006
comment profile send pm notify

Business owner fined for failing to register -- wasn't told
Monday, October 2, 2006
Print    E-Mail   
Two years ago a Sacramento couple, Amber and Ken Parsons, sold their home and plowed the equity into their dream business, Performance Concrete Pumping Inc. They purchased a new trailer-mounted 2004 transcrete concrete pump from Ricker's Machinery in Oakland for $45,000. "We buy new equipment because it gives us less problems," Amber Parsons recently told Dan Fauchier, public works liaison for the San Diego Engineering & General Contractors Association (EGCA). "We have liability insurance, workers comp, all our licenses; we try to do everything above board," Parsons added.
Making about $300 per project, within a year the Parsons bought a second machine, a 2005 Putzmeister pump from Bay Equipment in Freemont. For both machines, they filled out all the paperwork and registrations they were told about by DMV (which requires a motor carrier permit), the California Highway Patrol (for a "CA" license for the trailer and an "SE" special equipment plate for the pump) and by two different equipment manufacturers and two separate equipment dealers. The Parsons say they do not need a state contractor's license because they are an equipment provider to licensed contractors who actually place the concrete.
Working two jobs (Amber is also a real estate agent) and long hours they gradually branched out from their Sacramento base to work in five adjoining counties. Then on May 25, 2006, a Parsons operator was working a pump on a large housing tract in Placer County when the Placer County Air Pollution Control District inspector told their pump operator they needed a special portable equipment permit from the California Air Resources Board (CARB). That's when it all started to fall apart.
Parsons applied for the permit, but Placer County Pollution Control District visited the job site again on June 23, 2006, and slapped Parsons with a notice of violation carrying a potential fine of $10,000. As Parsons describes it, "They kindly offered us a 'settlement' of $2,000 in order to avoid a civil suit. This is despite the fact that we only made around $300 per job."
"Much to my dismay, I then discovered that the equipment that we purchased in 2004 and 2005 had 2003 Tier 1 engines in them," said Parsons. "The dealers didn't even know that. CARB tells us they no longer register Tier 1 engines. If we had been made aware that we needed to get a permit, we would have registered the equipment by Dec. 31, 2005."
But apparently no one in state government even attempted to make Parsons or any of the other 39 concrete pumping services in Sacramento County aware of the requirement, according to Parsons. They had all missed an unknown final "amnesty deadline" with no further grace period. On June 22, 2006, CARB's board voted to refuse to extend the deadline. County Supervisor Ron Roberts is a CARB board member, but was not present at that meeting. Roberts' staff told Fauchier that he was away on county business.
Contacted by EGCA for comment on how the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD) handles such matters, APCD Director Richard Smith said, "If a company has had no prior experience with the San Diego APCD, a notice to comply will be issued, rather than a notice of violation. There are no penalties associated with a notice to comply ... the hearing board will issue a Stipulated Order of Abatement to allow continued operation of the portable engine until compliance with state engine requirements can be achieved."
Therein lies the rub for the Parsons. "Placer County APCD has offered to settle it now for $500, but I have to sign a paper that we'll bring all our equipment into compliance within three years. That means we have to replace two new engines with two newer engines. They each cost at least $10,000 and we don't know if they will fit on the pumps -- the footprints are different, the hydraulics, the electronics. We're really in a bind."
What the Air Resources board and many local Air Pollution Control districts have done is strictly enforce these little known regulations and levy fines as much as $10,000 per day per engine. San Diego's APCD is far more business-friendly, but rules are rules. With no CARB permit available, local permits will cost the Parsons $600 per engine per year. The Parsons work in six counties: That's $7,200 per year for their two $10,000 engines. And they will still have to buy new engines in three years. "We don't know what we're going to do," says Parsons.
More information can be found at www.cleanairconstruction.org or www.egca.org.


Todd 10-02-2006
reply profile send pm notify

State notification efforts a failure, says industry
Monday, October 2, 2006
Print    E-Mail   
Construction-related businesses that utilize portable engines -- power generators, pumps, compressors, diesel pile-driving hammers, welders, cranes and woodchippers -- were required to register their engines by Dec. 31, 2005, or risk fines of $10,000 per engine per day, according to the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
"CARB did a terrible job getting the word out that everyone had to register all portable engines by last Dec. 31," said Mike Shaw, Engineering & General Contractors (EGCA) board member and president of Perry & Shaw in El Cajon. "There are almost 240,000 contractors in California; CARB notified only about 25,000 of them. They sent out these little innocuous 'advertisement' flyers that probably got thrown out with the 80 other flyers you get every day and there was no apparent effort at all to reach others who are not contractors. They could have reached out to equipment dealers, to industry associations, done an effective community outreach effort and worked to partner with business. They didn't do that."
"ARB outreach efforts included contacting over 25,000 businesses having contractor licenses with the State Contract Licensing Board, 3,000 people that previously had expressed interest in receiving information on the program directly from ARB, 1,600 businesses already in the PERP program, 1,200 businesses provided by the Construction Industry Air Quality Coalition, all engine manufacturers, industry associations, the engine manufacturing association and most all engine dealers," replied Richard Smith, director of the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (APCD). "In addition there were thousands of notices that individual air pollution control districts sent out informing businesses of the PERP requirements."
Southern California Contractors Association's Bill Davis took issue with Smith's statements and CARB's efforts. "According to the US Census Bureau, in 2002 there were 237,788 construction companies operating in California and CARB, at best, sent a notice to one in 10 of those ... maybe, because CARB's own staff admits that the CSLB mailing list is incredibly inaccurate -- the thousands of returned mailings are still stacked up somewhere in Sacramento. And the Amber Parsons of the world are not contractors and would not have been part of that meager notification effort."
As to manufacturers of concrete pumps, Amber Parsons, co-owner of Sacramento-based Performance Concrete Pumping Inc. -- who was recently hit with two notices of violation requiring payment of fines and an agreement to replace two new $10,000 Tier 1 engines with newer Tier 2 engines in three years -- said, "There are fewer than 10 manufacturers in existence, and CARB apparently failed to send a letter to any of them. We've bought new pumps from three different companies in three years. I talked to a guy named Doug, the son-in-law of the owner of Transcrete (a pump manufacturer based in Los Angeles), and he didn't know about [the registration requirements] and didn't even know why being a Tier 1 engine makes a difference."
"CIAQC's position is that registration should be an on-going and regular function of the regulation--not something that requires 'amnesty' like the industry is made up of a bunch of tax cheats or illegal aliens," said SCCA's Davis, a board member of the Construction Industry Air Quality Coalition, (CIAQC). "CIAQC knows what a miserable failure the outreach programs have been. CIAQC also knows that the consequences of the enforcement phase of this program will be the destruction of thousands of small and large contractors in this state. While the San Diego APCD may be very humane in its approach, others, such as the South Coast AQMD and Sacramento regional agency, are not. Talk to MCM Construction about the $34 million lawsuit the state is pursuing over this same regulation. No one is safe."
"San Diego's Engineering & General Contractors Association (EGCA) is working to get the word out to local contractors through its Web site, www.cleanairconstruction.org, and in public meetings and newspaper articles, but without a serious concerted effort by public agencies like the Air Resources Board, the task is very difficult," commented EGCA Executive Director Debbie Day.
"We're concerned this is a foreshadowing of things to come with new off road diesel engine emissions regulations on self-propelled equipment due to be enacted early 2007," reported EGCA Public Works Liaison Dan Fauchier.
"In terms of what you think we'll do in the future? Look at what we've done in the past," said Catherine Witherspoon, CARB's executive officer, in a comment for publication in the August EGCA Magazine. "Construction and mining equipment are the next important steps in the process of cleaning up California's air."
For more information see www.egca.org.

Sac 10-30-2006
reply profile send pm notify

  i dont feel sorry for them :D

 shady buisness anyways